Dumowith v. Marks
This text of 84 N.Y.S. 453 (Dumowith v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The proceedings taken by the plaintiff’s attorney, by virtue of the concluding clause of section 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to ascertain and enforce payment of his lien, are proper only between attorney and client. Rochfort v. Met. Street Ry. Co., 50 App. Div. 261, 63 N. Y. Supp. 1036. Nor does it appear that the plaintiff is insolvent. Youngv. Howell, 64 App. Div. 246, 72 N. Y. Supp. 5.
The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 N.Y.S. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumowith-v-marks-nyappterm-1903.