Dumlao v. Ashcroft

20 F. App'x 640
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 15, 2001·No. No. 00-70264; INS No. A29-272-228·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Christoffer Dumlao petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals that he is ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l) because he has not demonstrated that his removal would cause “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to a qualifying relative under § 1229b(b)(l)(D).

We lack jurisdiction to review Dumlao’s petition. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 249 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir.2001), amended by 2001 WL 579781 (9th Cir. May 30, 2001).

DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dumlao v. Ashcroft, 20 F. App'x 640 (9th Cir. 2001).

20 F. App'x 640 (Dumlao v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft
249 F.3d 1156 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)