Dumlao v. Ashcroft
20 F. App'x 640
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 15, 2001·No. No. 00-70264; INS No. A29-272-228·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Christoffer Dumlao petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals that he is ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l) because he has not demonstrated that his removal would cause “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to a qualifying relative under § 1229b(b)(l)(D).
We lack jurisdiction to review Dumlao’s petition. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 249 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir.2001), amended by 2001 WL 579781 (9th Cir. May 30, 2001).
DISMISSED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dumlao v. Ashcroft, 20 F. App'x 640 (9th Cir. 2001).
20 F. App'x 640 (Dumlao v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft
249 F.3d 1156 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)