Dumbadze v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dumbadze v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co.

263 A.D. 1018

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1942

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 1018 (Dumbadze v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dumbadze v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co., 263 A.D. 1018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from a resettled order denying his motion to strike out as insufficient in law the defenses numbered “ First ” to “ Ninth ” in defendant’s amended answer. In his brief plaintiff admits defenses numbered “ Second ” and “ Fourth ” are sufficient. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from the original order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff appeals from a resettled order denying his motion to strike out as insufficient in law the defenses numbered “ First ” to “ Ninth ” in defendant’s amended answer. In his brief plaintiff admits defenses numbered “ Second ” and “ Fourth ” are sufficient. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from the original order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumbadze-v-agency-of-canadian-car-foundry-co-nyappdiv-1942.