Dumas v. United States Lines, Inc.

181 A.D.2d 637

This text of 181 A.D.2d 637 (Dumas v. United States Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dumas v. United States Lines, Inc., 181 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered January 17, 1991, which, after a jury trial, found in favor of plaintiff as against defendant as to liability and awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $378,000 exclusive of interest and costs, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

According wide deference to the factfinder’s assessment of credibility and drawing all factual inferences in favor of [638]*638plaintiff, the successful litigant (1 Newman, New York Appellate Practice § 4.10), we conclude that the verdict does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501 [c]; Harvey v Mazal Am. Partners, 79 NY2d 218). Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. Mazal American Partners
79 N.Y.2d 218 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A.D.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumas-v-united-states-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1992.