Dumas v. State

85 S.W. 1058, 48 Tex. Crim. 27, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 78
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 1905
DocketNo. 3051.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 S.W. 1058 (Dumas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dumas v. State, 85 S.W. 1058, 48 Tex. Crim. 27, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 78 (Tex. 1905).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault and battery and fined $50. The State’s case clearly shows an aggravated assault and battery. Appellant interposed a plea of former conviction in the justice court. Shortly after the alleged assault, complaint was filed in the justice court, and the conviction for simple assault or an affray was obtained. The court instructed the jury, if they should find appellant guilty of aggravated assault to convict; and further instructed them, if they should find him guilty of simple assault, to acquit. Under the decisions in this- State and the law as enunciated, those charges were correct. We deem it unnecessary to enter *28 into a discussion of these matters. Davis v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 681. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Henderson, Judge, absent.

[Motion for rehearing overruled without written opinion.—Reporter.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
20 S.W.2d 1067 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.W. 1058, 48 Tex. Crim. 27, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumas-v-state-texcrimapp-1905.