Dumas v. State

290 S.E.2d 180, 162 Ga. App. 66, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3089
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 8, 1982·No. 63316·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault with intent to rape, enumerating only the general grounds.

The evidence amply supports the verdict of guilty. See Middlebrooks v. State, 156 Ga. App. 319 (1) (274 SE2d 643) (1980). “Issues regarding credibility of witnessess must be resolved solely by the jury. [Cit.] In this instance the jury, obviously, chose to believe the state’s witnesses.” Redd v. State, 154 Ga. App. 373 (1) (268 SE2d 423) (1980). After a review of the entire record, we find that any rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J. and Shulman, P. J., concur. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Scott Childress, Benjamin H. OehlertIH, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dumas v. State, 290 S.E.2d 180, 162 Ga. App. 66, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3089 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

290 S.E.2d 180 (Dumas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rucker v. State
341 S.E.2d 228 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Talley v. State
296 S.E.2d 173 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)