Dumas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dumas v. State

290 S.E.2d 180, 162 Ga. App. 66, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3089

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 8, 1982

Docket63316

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 290 S.E.2d 180 (Dumas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dumas v. State, 290 S.E.2d 180, 162 Ga. App. 66, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3089 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault with intent to rape, enumerating only the general grounds.

The evidence amply supports the verdict of guilty. See Middlebrooks v. State, 156 Ga. App. 319 (1) (274 SE2d 643) (1980). “Issues regarding credibility of witnessess must be resolved solely by the jury. [Cit.] In this instance the jury, obviously, chose to believe the state’s witnesses.” Redd v. State, 154 Ga. App. 373 (1) (268 SE2d 423) (1980). After a review of the entire record, we find that any rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J. and Shulman, P. J., concur. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Scott Childress, Benjamin H. OehlertIH, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault with intent to rape, enumerating only the general grounds.

The evidence amply supports the verdict of guilty. See Middlebrooks v. State, 156 Ga. App. 319 (1) (274 SE2d 643) (1980). “Issues regarding credibility of witnessess must be resolved solely by the jury. [Cit.] In this instance the jury, obviously, chose to believe the state’s witnesses.” Redd v. State, 154 Ga. App. 373 (1) (268 SE2d 423) (1980). After a review of the entire record, we find that any rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J. and Shulman, P. J., concur. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Scott Childress, Benjamin H. OehlertIH, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 S.E.2d 180, 162 Ga. App. 66, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumas-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack