Dumas v. State

63 Ga. 600
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by50 cases

This text of 63 Ga. 600 (Dumas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dumas v. State, 63 Ga. 600 (Ga. 1879).

Opinion

Jackson, Justice.

A carefully prepared syllabus in this ease renders it unnecessary to elaborate the points wherein the judgment of the court is approved. Comparison of that syllabus with the facts reported will clearly show the judgment on each point. We find but oue error in the entire record, and the trial of this case is- another evidence of the clear head and. strong sense of the able judge who presided.

The error itself on which the new trial is awarded is such that, exeept in a case which involved human life, would hardly suffice to .justify this court in putting the county to. the trouble and expense of another hearing; and if the penalty imposed upon the man who actually and undoubtedly did the shooting bad been imposed on Ms less guilty associate, less guilty in any view of the facts, to-wit: imprisonment for life, for myself I should not have favored a new trial.

[604]*604The defendant did confess his presence, but denied his guilty complicity with the offense. It was therefore error to say that confessions of guilt should be closely scanned, and while it was doubtless in the mind of the presiding judge to lighten the effect of the defendant’s confession of his presence, yet the jury may have misunderstood him, and probably thought that the judge as good as said he had confessed it; and therefore, and for this reason solely, we grant a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Leverette
912 S.E.2d 533 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025)
Edison v. State
344 S.E.2d 231 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1986)
Pendergrass v. State
266 S.E.2d 225 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Johnson v. State
251 S.E.2d 563 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Norrell v. State
157 S.E.2d 784 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Cash v. State
148 S.E.2d 420 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Lawton v. Byck
124 S.E.2d 369 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Fields v. State
85 S.E.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Brown v. State
105 A.2d 646 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1954)
Braswell v. State
74 S.E.2d 106 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Gresham v. State
66 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Brown v. State
41 S.E.2d 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Pressley v. State
39 S.E.2d 478 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Cady v. State
31 S.E.2d 38 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Barnes v. State
29 S.E.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Hancock v. State
26 S.E.2d 760 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Sheffield v. State
2 S.E.2d 657 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Wright v. State
199 S.E. 209 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Grubbs v. State
186 S.E. 140 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Powers v. State
157 S.E. 195 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Ga. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumas-v-state-ga-1879.