Dumas v. State
This text of 462 So. 2d 1105 (Dumas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony DUMAS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted jurisdiction in this cause, reported below as Dumas v. State, 439 So.2d 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), on the basis of conflict with Cirio v. State, 440 So.2d 650 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), and Johnson v. State, 411 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Upon further review, we find that there is no conflict because of the distinctive factual circumstances in the instant case, and, consequently, no basis for this Court to accept jurisdiction. The petition for review is denied.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
ADKINS, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 So. 2d 1105, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumas-v-state-fla-1985.