Dumais v. Underwood
714 A.2d 4, 244 Conn. 918, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 156
This text of 714 A.2d 4 (Dumais v. Underwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dumais v. Underwood, 714 A.2d 4, 244 Conn. 918, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 156 (Colo. 1998).
Opinion
The defendants David Underwood, Thomas Arcari, Reade Clemens, Vincent Riera, Joseph Plourde and George Fensick’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 783 (AC 16291), is denied.
MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dumais v. Underwood
707 A.2d 333 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
714 A.2d 4, 244 Conn. 918, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumais-v-underwood-conn-1998.