Duluth-Superior Dredging Co. v. Interstate Steamship Co.

Sixth Circuit

Duluth-Superior Dredging Co. v. Interstate Steamship Co.

145 F.2d 233, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 10, 1944

DocketNo. 9782

StatusPublished

This text of 145 F.2d 233 (Duluth-Superior Dredging Co. v. Interstate Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duluth-Superior Dredging Co. v. Interstate Steamship Co., 145 F.2d 233, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452 (6th Cir. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the respondent from a decree for a money award to the libellant in a proceeding in admiralty having been [234]*234heard and considered upon the record and upon the oral arguments and briefs of the proctors; and it appearing to this court that the findings of fact of the district court upon which the liability of respondent for damages was rested are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous; and it further appearing that the findings of fact upon the 'issue of damages as contained in the report of the special master, which report was approved by the district judge, are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous; and no error of law being revealed in the proceedings below, the final decree of the district court entered January 3, 1944, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the respondent from a decree for a money award to the libellant in a proceeding in admiralty having been [234]*234heard and considered upon the record and upon the oral arguments and briefs of the proctors; and it appearing to this court that the findings of fact of the district court upon which the liability of respondent for damages was rested are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous; and it further appearing that the findings of fact upon the 'issue of damages as contained in the report of the special master, which report was approved by the district judge, are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous; and no error of law being revealed in the proceedings below, the final decree of the district court entered January 3, 1944, is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 F.2d 233, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duluth-superior-dredging-co-v-interstate-steamship-co-ca6-1944.