Duller v. McNeill

161 S.W. 45, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 974
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 24, 1913·Published

Opinion

REESE, J.

In a suit by W. A. McNeill against Carrie Nell Duller and her husband, McNeill recovered a judgment for money against both defendants, and foreclosing mortgage and vendor’s liens against certain real estate. From this judgment Mrs. Duller appeals. She gave a supersedeas bond signed by herself and several sureties. The bond is payable to McNeill and also against Duller, the husband. Appellee, McNeill, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that Mrs. Duller, being a married woman, cannot bind herself or her separate estate by the execution of such bond, and that it is void as to her.

It seems to be settled by a long line of decisions in this state that it is not necessary that such bond be signed by the principal. Shelton v. Wade, 4 Tex. 148, 51 Am. Dec. 722; Lindsay v. Price, 33 Tex. 280; McKellor v. Peck, 39 Tex. 381; Bridges v. Cundiff, 45 Tex. 439; San Roman v. Watson, 54 Tex. 254; Palmer v. Spandenberg, 49 Tex. Civ. App. 331, 108 S. W. 478.

The motion is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duller v. McNeill, 161 S.W. 45, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 974 (Tex. Ct. App. 1913).

161 S.W. 45 (Duller v. McNeill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palmer v. Spandenberg
108 S.W. 477 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Webb, Jr. v. Gregory
108 S.W. 478 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Randon v. Barton
4 Tex. 145 (Texas Supreme Court, 1849)
Lindsay v. Price
33 Tex. 280 (Texas Supreme Court, 1870)
McKellar v. Peck
39 Tex. 381 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)
Bridges v. Cundiff
45 Tex. 437 (Texas Supreme Court, 1876)
San Roman v. Watson
54 Tex. 254 (Texas Supreme Court, 1880)