Dull v. Ulshafer
21 A. 447, 140 Pa. 537, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 868
This text of 21 A. 447 (Dull v. Ulshafer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dull v. Ulshafer, 21 A. 447, 140 Pa. 537, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 868 (Pa. 1891).
Opinion
We think the portion of the charge referred to in the first assignment was fully warranted by the evidence. The remaining assignment alleges that the court erred in not giving a binding instruction in favor of the defendants. We cannot say there was error in this, as the case was one for a jury. It does not require discussion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 A. 447, 140 Pa. 537, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dull-v-ulshafer-pa-1891.