Dull v. Dull

144 S.E.2d 587, 265 N.C. 562, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1047
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 3, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 S.E.2d 587 (Dull v. Dull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dull v. Dull, 144 S.E.2d 587, 265 N.C. 562, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1047 (N.C. 1965).

Opinion

PER Cubiam.

The appellant did not except to the facts found by the court below, and the findings of fact are sufficient to support the order entered below. Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486. Where no exceptions have been taken to the findings of fact, such findings are presumed to be correct and are binding on appeal. Goldsboro v. R. R., supra, and cited cases.

Orders for the support of minor children are subject to modification upon a proper showing of a change of conditions. Blankenship v. Blankenship, 256 N.C. 638, 124 S.E. 2d 857; Griffin v. Griffin, 237 N.C. 404, 75 S.E. 2d 133; Hardee v. Mitchell, 230 N.C. 40, 51 S.E. 2d 884.

The judgment from which this appeal was taken is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Khajanchi v. Khajanchi
537 S.E.2d 845 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E.2d 587, 265 N.C. 562, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dull-v-dull-nc-1965.