Dulce Pam Beltran Pullen v. Adam R. Pullen
This text of Dulce Pam Beltran Pullen v. Adam R. Pullen (Dulce Pam Beltran Pullen v. Adam R. Pullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00304-CV ___________________________
DULCE PAM BELTRAN PULLEN, Appellant
V.
ADAM R. PULLEN, Appellee
On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360-725260-22
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce signed on March 28, 2025. On
January 26, 2026, the parties were notified that this matter would be submitted on
Tuesday, February 24, 2026. Although the court was not informed that the parties
were engaged in settlement discussions, on Friday, February 20, 2026, Appellant
Dulce Pam Beltran Pullen filed an “Unopposed Motion to Set Aside Judgment and
Remand” and attached a “Partial Settlement Agreement.”
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B), the parties have
requested that we “set aside the division of property and remand for the trial court to
render a new division of property.” See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); cf. Stampede TX
Energy, LLC v. Bridgetex Pipeline Co., No. 01-18-00113-CV, 2019 WL 758003, at *1
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 21, 2019, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.)
(granting motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits
and remanding to the trial court for rendition of judgment). No opinion has issued in
this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(c).
We grant the “Unopposed Motion to Set Aside Judgment and Remand.” We
affirm the portion of the final decree granting the divorce and the unchallenged
orders within the final decree concerning conservatorship, possession and access,
child support, and medical support. See In re Marriage of Cruey, No. 12-24-00159-CV,
2025 WL 2416806, at *11 n.7 (Tex. App.—Tyler Aug. 20, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op.)
(stating that while the issue of divorce cannot be severed from a parties’ estate
2 division in the trial court, where neither party attacks the decretal portion of the
judgment granting divorce, the appellate court may affirm the divorce and reverse and
remand the property division); Gamboa v. Gamboa, 383 S.W.3d 263, 274 (Tex. App.—
San Antonio 2012, no pet.) (reversing and remanding property division but affirming
divorce judgment in all other respects, including the granting of the divorce and the
orders concerning conservatorship, possession and access, child support, and medical
support). We set aside the terms of the final decree that address division of the
marital estate, including determining and confirming separate property, without regard
to the merits, and we remand the case to the trial court to make a new property
division. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(a), (d).
/s/ Dabney Bassel
Dabney Bassel Justice
Delivered: February 26, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dulce Pam Beltran Pullen v. Adam R. Pullen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dulce-pam-beltran-pullen-v-adam-r-pullen-txctapp2-2026.