Dulaney v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dulaney v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

21 Mo. App. 597, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 230

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 19, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 21 Mo. App. 597 (Dulaney v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dulaney v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co., 21 Mo. App. 597, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 230 (Mo. Ct. App. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Ellison, J.

— This action was begun in the Moberly court of common pleas, and by change of venue was transferred to the circuit court of Pettis county.

It is brought by plaintiffs as- mother and father of Keene Dulaney, who was killed while in defendant’s employ. He was between seventeen and eighteen years of age, and was engaged as brakemen in switching cars in the city of Sedalia. There were five cars being switched onto a “Y.” In the second car back of the engine, which was a flat car, there were several large spikes which seem to have been driven up through the bottom of the car, and were sticking above the surface of the floor. These spikes are charged to have been the cause of the deceased falling from the train, and defendant is charged with negligence in permitting them to be in the car. The verdict was for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

At the close of plaintiffs’ testimony, defendant asked an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence, which being refused, it afterwards interposed a motion in arrest, which was likewise overruled.

The petition, while stating that the deceased was the minor son of plaintiffs, past seventeen years old, fails to allege that he was unmarried, and for this reason the motion in arrest should have been sustained, as without such averment there was no cause of action alleged.

The right of action given by sections 2121 and 2122, Revised Statutes is statutory. It did not exist at common law. Being created by the statute, one who sues must bring himself within the statutory terms. McNamara v. Slavens, 76 Mo. 329. The right of action in this case only belongs to the father and mother in the event that [600]*600there is no wife. The language of the statute is “if such deceased he a minor and unmarried, then the action enures to the father and mother. The principle announced in Barker v. Railroad, Supreme Court of Missouri, not yet reported, fully sustains this view.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

.All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellison, J.

— This action was begun in the Moberly court of common pleas, and by change of venue was transferred to the circuit court of Pettis county.

It is brought by plaintiffs as- mother and father of Keene Dulaney, who was killed while in defendant’s employ. He was between seventeen and eighteen years of age, and was engaged as brakemen in switching cars in the city of Sedalia. There were five cars being switched onto a “Y.” In the second car back of the engine, which was a flat car, there were several large spikes which seem to have been driven up through the bottom of the car, and were sticking above the surface of the floor. These spikes are charged to have been the cause of the deceased falling from the train, and defendant is charged with negligence in permitting them to be in the car. The verdict was for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

At the close of plaintiffs’ testimony, defendant asked an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence, which being refused, it afterwards interposed a motion in arrest, which was likewise overruled.

The petition, while stating that the deceased was the minor son of plaintiffs, past seventeen years old, fails to allege that he was unmarried, and for this reason the motion in arrest should have been sustained, as without such averment there was no cause of action alleged.

The right of action given by sections 2121 and 2122, Revised Statutes is statutory. It did not exist at common law. Being created by the statute, one who sues must bring himself within the statutory terms. McNamara v. Slavens, 76 Mo. 329. The right of action in this case only belongs to the father and mother in the event that [600]*600there is no wife. The language of the statute is “if such deceased he a minor and unmarried, then the action enures to the father and mother. The principle announced in Barker v. Railroad, Supreme Court of Missouri, not yet reported, fully sustains this view.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

.All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Mo. App. 597, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dulaney-v-missouri-pacific-railway-co-moctapp-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack