Dulaney v. Coppard

145 F.2d 468, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2544
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 1944
DocketNo. 10878
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 145 F.2d 468 (Dulaney v. Coppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dulaney v. Coppard, 145 F.2d 468, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2544 (5th Cir. 1944).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from was well within, and was a proper exercise of, the referee’s authority. There is no merit whatever in the bankrupt’s contention that the action of the referee in entering the extension order without first giving the bankrupt notice of his intention to enter it deprived the bankrupt of due process. The statute does not make notice to the bankrupt a condition of entering such orders. There is no evidence whatever that the entry of the order, without first notifying the bankrupt, deprived him of any constitutional right. The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 F.2d 468, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dulaney-v-coppard-ca5-1944.