Dula . Young and Clark, Adm'rs.
73 N.C. 69
This text of 73 N.C. 69 (Dula . Young and Clark, Adm'rs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dula . Young and Clark, Adm'rs., 73 N.C. 69 (N.C. 1875).
Opinion
The learned argument of the counsel for the petitioner failed to satisfy us that we had mistaken any important fact, or misapplied any principle of law or equity. ¥e must therefore adhere to our decision, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of our learned brother, Justice Settle.
There will be judgment against the petitioner for cost.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dula v. . Young
70 N.C. 450 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 N.C. 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dula-young-and-clark-admrs-nc-1875.