Dula . Young and Clark, Adm'rs.

73 N.C. 69
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1875·Published

Opinion

Reade, J.

The learned argument of the counsel for the petitioner failed to satisfy us that we had mistaken any important fact, or misapplied any principle of law or equity. ¥e must therefore adhere to our decision, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of our learned brother, Justice Settle.

There will be judgment against the petitioner for cost.

Pee Cueiam.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dula . Young and Clark, Adm'rs., 73 N.C. 69 (N.C. 1875).

73 N.C. 69 (Dula . Young and Clark, Adm'rs.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dula v. . Young
70 N.C. 450 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)