Dula v. National Security Agency

Fourth Circuit

Dula v. National Security Agency

332 F. App'x 97

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2009·No. No. 08-2352·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Duey Dula appeals the district court’s order dismissing Dula’s complaint and denying him injunctive and mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis[98] trict court. Dula v. Nat’l Sec. Agency, No. 8:08-cv-00427-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2008). We deny Dula’s motions for mandamus and general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Duey Dula appeals the district court’s order dismissing Dula’s complaint and denying him injunctive and mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis[98] trict court. Dula v. Nat’l Sec. Agency, No. 8:08-cv-00427-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2008). We deny Dula’s motions for mandamus and general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dula v. National Security Agency, 332 F. App'x 97 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 97 (Dula v. National Security Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.