Dukes v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2026·No. 25-891·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 27 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELONIECE M. DUKES, No. 25-891 D.C. No. 2:25-cv-00284-JJT Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 25, 2026** Before: SILVERMAN, N.R. SMITH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Meloniece M. Dukes appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) as barred by the statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Gregg v. Hawaii, Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 870 F.3d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 2017)

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

(dismissal on the basis of the applicable statute of limitations); Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Dukes’s action as untimely because Dukes failed to allege facts sufficient to show that she presented her claim to the Department of Veterans Affairs within two years after the claim accrued or that she was otherwise entitled to equitable tolling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) (setting forth the two-year statute of limitations for presentment of claims under the FTCA); Bennett v. United States, 44 F.4th 929, 933 (9th Cir. 2022) (explaining that a medical malpractice claim under the FTCA accrues once “a plaintiff knows of both the existence of an injury and its cause” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Redlin v. United States, 921 F.3d 1133, 1140 (9th Cir. 2019) (outlining the requirements for equitable tolling under the FTCA).

AFFIRMED.

2 25-891

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dukes v. United States, (9th Cir. 2026).

Dukes v. United States (Dukes v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raymond Watison v. Mary Carter
668 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Alexandria Gregg v. Hawaii Dept. of Public Safety
870 F.3d 883 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Michael Redlin v. United States
921 F.3d 1133 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
Bette Bennett v. United States
44 F.4th 929 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)