Dukes v. State
This text of 289 S.E.2d 322 (Dukes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary in July of 1980 and given a five-year probated sentence. This appeal is from the revocation of that probation. His attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, have any merit. We have therefore granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. McBee v. State, 158 Ga. App. 662 (282 SE2d 224).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
289 S.E.2d 322, 160 Ga. App. 241, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 3211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dukes-v-state-gactapp-1981.