Dukes v. Richards

Fourth Circuit

Dukes v. Richards

366 F. App'x 467

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2010·No. No. 09-7711·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michel Andre Dukes appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant summary judgment on Dukes’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Dukes v. Richards, No. 5:06-ct-03094-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michel Andre Dukes appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant summary judgment on Dukes’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Dukes v. Richards, No. 5:06-ct-03094-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dukes v. Richards, 366 F. App'x 467 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

366 F. App'x 467 (Dukes v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related