Dukes v. Dukes

351 So. 2d 1021, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4060
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 3, 1977·No. No. 50439·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. The Writ was issued, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and KARL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dukes v. Dukes, 351 So. 2d 1021, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4060 (Fla. 1977).

351 So. 2d 1021 (Dukes v. Dukes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. Estate of Walton
601 So. 2d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Severini v. Pan Am. Beauty School, Inc.
557 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)