Dukes v. Dukes

351 So. 2d 1021, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4060
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 3, 1977
DocketNo. 50439
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 351 So. 2d 1021 (Dukes v. Dukes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dukes v. Dukes, 351 So. 2d 1021, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4060 (Fla. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. The Writ was issued, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and KARL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walton v. Estate of Walton
601 So. 2d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Severini v. Pan Am. Beauty School, Inc.
557 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
351 So. 2d 1021, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dukes-v-dukes-fla-1977.