Dukes v. Arias
This text of Dukes v. Arias (Dukes v. Arias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
WALTER DUKES, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 2:23-CV-00336-GSL-JEM
MARVIN RODRIGUEZ ARIAS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge John E. Martin’s sua sponte report and recommendation entered on April 19, 2023. [DE 23]. For the reasons fully explained in the report, Judge Martin recommends that the Court dismiss Defendant Marvin Rodriguez Arias from the case without prejudice. Over fourteen days have passed without any objections being filed, so the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” (citations omitted)). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Martin’s report and recommendation in full and orders that Defendant Marvin Rodriguez Arias is DISMISSED from the case without prejudice. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: May 15, 2024.
/s/ GRETCHEN S. LUND Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dukes v. Arias, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dukes-v-arias-innd-2024.