Dukes of Dixieland v. Audio Fidelity, Inc.

19 A.D.2d 615, 242 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dukes of Dixieland v. Audio Fidelity, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 A.D.2d 872

Opinion

Orders entered on May 3, 1962, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motions to dismiss the third-party complaint granted, with $10 costs, without prejudice, however, in the exercise of discretion, to the institution of a separate action by respondent (cf. Braun v. City of New York, 17 A D 2d 264; Kratter Gorp. v. Grad, Appeal No. 566, Cal. June 4, 1963). We do not reach or pass upon the merits of respondent’s claim. We hold only that, as pleaded, the third-party complaint fails to meet the basic requirements of section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Steuer, Bergan and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dukes of Dixieland v. Audio Fidelity, Inc., 19 A.D.2d 615, 242 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

19 A.D.2d 615 (Dukes of Dixieland v. Audio Fidelity, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.