Duke Woodley v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, Gary Wagner

889 F.2d 1085, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16692, 1989 WL 134652
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 3, 1989·No. 89-6802·Unpublished

Opinion

889 F.2d 1085
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Duke WOODLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections, Gary
Wagner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6802.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 22, 1989.
Decided Nov. 3, 1989.

Duke Woodley, appellant pro se.

Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Duke Woodley appeals the magistrate's denial of his second motion to reduce a partial filing fee assessed pursuant to Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 this Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final orders. A final order is one which disposes of all issues in dispute as to all parties. It "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment." Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).

As the order appealed from is not a final order, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. The district court has not directed entry of final judgment as to particular claims or parties under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), nor is the order appealable under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292. Finally, the order is not appealable as a collateral order under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

Finding no basis for appellate jurisdiction, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues have been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duke Woodley v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, Gary Wagner, 889 F.2d 1085, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16692, 1989 WL 134652 (4th Cir. 1989).

889 F.2d 1085 (Duke Woodley v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, Gary Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Catlin v. United States
324 U.S. 229 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Evans v. Croom
650 F.2d 521 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)