Duke v. Stokely-Bordo

Supreme Court of Florida

Duke v. Stokely-Bordo

209 So. 2d 459, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2279

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1968

DocketNo. 37057

StatusPublished

This text of 209 So. 2d 459 (Duke v. Stokely-Bordo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duke v. Stokely-Bordo, 209 So. 2d 459, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2279 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 30, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI