Duke v. State
76 S.E. 368, 11 Ga. App. 814, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 202
Opinion
The only assignment of error covered by the brief submitted in this ease and relied upon by the plaintiff in error is that the court should have granted a new trial on the ground of alleged newly discovered testimony. This alleged newly discovered testimony is impeaching in its character, and is not such as would probably produce a different result on a second trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duke v. State, 76 S.E. 368, 11 Ga. App. 814, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
76 S.E. 368 (Duke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. O'Kelley
80 S.E. 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)