Duke v. State

55 S.W.3d 756, 346 Ark. 159, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 485
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 27, 2001·No. CR 01-967·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Benjamin C. Duke, by and through his attorney, Bryan Christian, has filed a motion to file a belated appeal. His attorney accepts responsibility for the untimeliness in filing a notice of appeal and states in his motion that the notice of appeal was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam); Jacks v. State, 344 Ark. 405, 39 S.W.3d 798 (2001).

Appellant’s motion is granted. A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duke v. State, 55 S.W.3d 756, 346 Ark. 159, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 485 (Ark. 2001).

55 S.W.3d 756 (Duke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacks v. State
39 S.W.3d 459 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)
Jacks v. State
39 S.W.3d 798 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)