Duke v. Sims
This text of 28 S.E.2d 174 (Duke v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error filed an affidavit showing service by him of the bill of exceptions on June 7, 1943. The certificate to the bill of exceptions was signed by the judge on June 8, 1943. Service of a bill of exceptions before it is certified by a judge is no service. Riley v. Echols, 99 Ga. 321 (25 S. E. 649). The affidavit cannot be construed to mean that the date on the judge’s certificate is incorrect, for the reason that there is no authority for a party to do what the judge himself cannot do. Consolidated Naval Stores Co. v. McPhatter, 147 Ga. 797 (95 S. E. 686). Nor will an affidavit suffice when made after the time allowed for service and filing of the bill of exceptions, to the effect that the service was made on the same date the certificate was signed. Plummer v. Moore, 63 Ga. 626; Goodwin v. Kennedy, 99 Ga. 123 (24 S. E. 975) ; Brantley v. McArthur, 132 Ga. 459 (64 S. E. 325).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 S.E.2d 174, 70 Ga. App. 318, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duke-v-sims-gactapp-1943.