Duke v. Huguley
119 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 621
This text of 119 So. 920 (Duke v. Huguley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Duke v. Huguley, 119 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 621 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
Action in detinue. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. There appears to be no assignment of errors, and therefore, under rule 1 of the Supreme Court, the judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duke-v-huguley-alactapp-1928.