Duke v. Hill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Duke v. Hill

63 S.E. 823, 132 Ga. 173, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 57

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 22, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 S.E. 823 (Duke v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duke v. Hill, 63 S.E. 823, 132 Ga. 173, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 57 (Ga. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, J.

This ease is brought here for review by a bill of exceptions sued out to an order consolidating two cases with a third ease and providing that the three cases should be tried as one case. Held, that the bill of exceptions must be dismissed, it not appearing that there has been any such final decision or judgment in any one of the eases as is reviewable here in a direct bill of exceptions to this court. If the court below erred in passing the order, the proper remedy was to file exceptions pendente lite in that court.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, J.

This ease is brought here for review by a bill of exceptions sued out to an order consolidating two cases with a third ease and providing that the three cases should be tried as one case. Held, that the bill of exceptions must be dismissed, it not appearing that there has been any such final decision or judgment in any one of the eases as is reviewable here in a direct bill of exceptions to this court. If the court below erred in passing the order, the proper remedy was to file exceptions pendente lite in that court.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 S.E. 823, 132 Ga. 173, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duke-v-hill-ga-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack