Home/Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama/Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc.

Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc.

686 So. 2d 262, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 836, 1996 WL 676671
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 683 →
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided November 22, 1996·No. 2940963·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

MONROE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of October 18, 1996, 686 So.2d 260 (Ala.1996), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, YATES, and CRAWLEY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc., 686 So. 2d 262, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 836, 1996 WL 676671 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

686 So. 2d 262 (Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Gold Kist, Inc.
686 So. 2d 260 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996)