Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc.

686 So. 2d 262, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 836, 1996 WL 676671
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedNovember 22, 1996
Docket2940963
StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 262 (Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc., 686 So. 2d 262, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 836, 1996 WL 676671 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

MONROE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of October 18, 1996, 686 So.2d 260 (Ala.1996), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, YATES, and CRAWLEY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Gold Kist, Inc.
686 So. 2d 260 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 262, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 836, 1996 WL 676671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duke-v-gold-kist-inc-alacivapp-1996.