Duke v. Bolster

Washington Supreme Court

Duke v. Bolster

211 P. 715, 123 Wash. 702, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 687

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 12, 1923

DocketNo. 17260

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 P. 715 (Duke v. Bolster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duke v. Bolster, 211 P. 715, 123 Wash. 702, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 687 (Wash. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The issues in this case are the same as those in Duke v. Johnson, ante p. 43, 211 Pac. 710, the two cases being presented on the same briefs and arguments. In the Johnson case we decided that the action was properly brought by J. P. Duke, as supervisor of banking, and sustained a judgment in his favor.

Upon the authority of .the Johnson case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The issues in this case are the same as those in Duke v. Johnson, ante p. 43, 211 Pac. 710, the two cases being presented on the same briefs and arguments. In the Johnson case we decided that the action was properly brought by J. P. Duke, as supervisor of banking, and sustained a judgment in his favor.

Upon the authority of .the Johnson case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 P. 715, 123 Wash. 702, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duke-v-bolster-wash-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack