Duke v. Anderson

211 A.D. 823

This text of 211 A.D. 823 (Duke v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duke v. Anderson, 211 A.D. 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Orders and judgment reversed on the law, with costs to the appellant, on the ground appellant did not waive her right to a jury trial by service of notice of trial for a Special Term, and upon the authority of Wheelock v. Lee (74 N. Y. 495).

All concur, except Cochrane, P. J., and Hinman, J., dissenting on the authority of Mackellar v. Rogers (109 N. Y. 468, 472).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacKellar v. . Rogers
17 N.E. 350 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
Wheelock v. . Lee
74 N.Y. 495 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 A.D. 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duke-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1924.