Duke Power Company v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment
204 S.E.2d 22, 285 N.C. 235
This text of 204 S.E.2d 22 (Duke Power Company v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Duke Power Company v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment, 204 S.E.2d 22, 285 N.C. 235 (N.C. 1974).
Opinion
DUKE POWER COMPANY
v.
SALISBURY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Carlton, Rhodes & Thurston, for defendants.
William I. Ward, Kluttz & Hamlin, Richard R. Reamer, for plaintiff.
Petition for writ of certiorari by Defendants Thurston, Crayton & Rutledge, to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 20 N.C.App. 730, 202 S. E.2d 607. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Board of County Commissioners v. Maine Central Railroad
343 A.2d 877 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
204 S.E.2d 22, 285 N.C. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duke-power-company-v-salisbury-zoning-board-of-adjustment-nc-1974.