Duke Power Company v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment
204 S.E.2d 22, 285 N.C. 235
Opinion
DUKE POWER COMPANY
v.
SALISBURY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Carlton, Rhodes & Thurston, for defendants.
William I. Ward, Kluttz & Hamlin, Richard R. Reamer, for plaintiff.
Petition for writ of certiorari by Defendants Thurston, Crayton & Rutledge, to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 20 N.C.App. 730, 202 S. E.2d 607. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duke Power Company v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment, 204 S.E.2d 22, 285 N.C. 235 (N.C. 1974).
204 S.E.2d 22 (Duke Power Company v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Board of County Commissioners v. Maine Central Railroad
343 A.2d 877 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1975)