DUKE, MICHELLE L. v. DUKE, BRIAN A.

96 A.D.3d 1490, 945 N.Y.S.2d 587

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 2012·No. CA 10-01871·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

762 CA 10-01871 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

MICHELLE L. DUKE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

BRIAN A. DUKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BRIAN A. DUKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

MATTAR, D’AGOSTINO & GOTTLIEB, LLP, BUFFALO (JONATHAN SCHAPP OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered March 25, 2010. The order amended a judgment of divorce.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

762 CA 10-01871 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

MICHELLE L. DUKE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

BRIAN A. DUKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BRIAN A. DUKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

MATTAR, D’AGOSTINO & GOTTLIEB, LLP, BUFFALO (JONATHAN SCHAPP OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered March 25, 2010. The order amended a judgment of divorce.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

DUKE, MICHELLE L. v. DUKE, BRIAN A., 96 A.D.3d 1490, 945 N.Y.S.2d 587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

96 A.D.3d 1490 (DUKE, MICHELLE L. v. DUKE, BRIAN A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.