Dukaj v. Department of Social Services

Michigan Court of Appeals

Dukaj v. Department of Social Services

419 N.W.2d 423, 165 Mich. App. 447

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 4, 1988

DocketDocket No. 98224

StatusPublished

This text of 419 N.W.2d 423 (Dukaj v. Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dukaj v. Department of Social Services, 419 N.W.2d 423, 165 Mich. App. 447 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

on remand

Before: Danhof, C.J., and Hood and J. B. Sullivan, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case has been remanded to us by order of our Supreme Court, 428 Mich 855 (1987), vacating our decision at 152 Mich App 433; 394 NW2d 38 (1986). We have been instructed to determine whether petitioner’s situation qualifies under the "life threatening circumstance” exception to the lump sum rule, 42 USC 602(a)(17). The exception was adopted by the Department of Social Services on April 1, 1983. On April 16, 1987, we remanded to the Department of Social Services for entry of factual findings as to whether petitioner’s situation was life-threatening. The hearing officer [449]*449found that petitioner had experienced a life-threatening circumstance causing loss of a lump sum payment. Therefore, the circuit court’s ruling that petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of the life-threatening circumstance exception is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

on remand

Before: Danhof, C.J., and Hood and J. B. Sullivan, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case has been remanded to us by order of our Supreme Court, 428 Mich 855 (1987), vacating our decision at 152 Mich App 433; 394 NW2d 38 (1986). We have been instructed to determine whether petitioner’s situation qualifies under the "life threatening circumstance” exception to the lump sum rule, 42 USC 602(a)(17). The exception was adopted by the Department of Social Services on April 1, 1983. On April 16, 1987, we remanded to the Department of Social Services for entry of factual findings as to whether petitioner’s situation was life-threatening. The hearing officer [449]*449found that petitioner had experienced a life-threatening circumstance causing loss of a lump sum payment. Therefore, the circuit court’s ruling that petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of the life-threatening circumstance exception is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 N.W.2d 423, 165 Mich. App. 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dukaj-v-department-of-social-services-michctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack