Duhnin v. Herbst
192 A.D. 887
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1920
StatusPublished
This text of 192 A.D. 887 (Duhnin v. Herbst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Duhnin v. Herbst, 192 A.D. 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinion
Motion to confirm referee’s report granted; substitution ordered in accordance therewith. Present Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ. Settle order on notice before the presiding justice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
192 A.D. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duhnin-v-herbst-nyappdiv-1920.