Duhme v. Mehner

Ohio Supreme Court

Duhme v. Mehner

65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 593

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 10, 1901

DocketNo. 6624

StatusPublished

This text of 65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 593 (Duhme v. Mehner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duhme v. Mehner, 65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 593 (Ohio 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on the ground that the suit is barred by the statute of limitations, the' evidence showing that all the parties, including the minor son, knew of the alleged fraud in the settlement for more than four years before the suit was brought, and for more than four years after the minor son became of age; and furthermore the equities seem to be with the defendants.

Minshall, C. J., Burket and Dávis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed on the ground that the suit is barred by the statute of limitations, the' evidence showing that all the parties, including the minor son, knew of the alleged fraud in the settlement for more than four years before the suit was brought, and for more than four years after the minor son became of age; and furthermore the equities seem to be with the defendants.

Minshall, C. J., Burket and Dávis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duhme-v-mehner-ohio-1901.