Duguid v. Duguid

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Duguid v. Duguid

533 So. 2d 958, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2576, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5206, 1988 WL 124703

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 23, 1988

DocketNo. 88-416

StatusPublished

This text of 533 So. 2d 958 (Duguid v. Duguid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duguid v. Duguid, 533 So. 2d 958, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2576, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5206, 1988 WL 124703 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Husband William George Duguid appeals, and wife Deborah Lynn Duguid cross-appeals, from an order of the trial court granting wife’s motion for modification and enforcement of the final judgment of dissolution. Of the numerous issues raised by both parties, all but one are found to be completely without merit and indeed to border on the frivolous. With regard to the issue on appeal alleging error in the trial court’s requirements that husband pay $5,928.00 in medical day care expenses, and in the future be responsible for all of the children’s noncovered medical expenses, a cursory review of the final order in its entirety reveals that the foregoing are no more than clerical errors neither of which, despite numerous post-order motions below, have ever been brought to the attention of the trial court as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. We therefore decline to address them further here.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, C.J. and NIMMONS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

Husband William George Duguid appeals, and wife Deborah Lynn Duguid cross-appeals, from an order of the trial court granting wife’s motion for modification and enforcement of the final judgment of dissolution. Of the numerous issues raised by both parties, all but one are found to be completely without merit and indeed to border on the frivolous. With regard to the issue on appeal alleging error in the trial court’s requirements that husband pay $5,928.00 in medical day care expenses, and in the future be responsible for all of the children’s noncovered medical expenses, a cursory review of the final order in its entirety reveals that the foregoing are no more than clerical errors neither of which, despite numerous post-order motions below, have ever been brought to the attention of the trial court as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. We therefore decline to address them further here.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, C.J. and NIMMONS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

533 So. 2d 958, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2576, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5206, 1988 WL 124703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duguid-v-duguid-fladistctapp-1988.