Duguay v. Progressive Corp./St. Paul Travelers

50 So. 3d 42, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18069, 2010 WL 4722493
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 22, 2010
Docket1D10-2700
StatusPublished

This text of 50 So. 3d 42 (Duguay v. Progressive Corp./St. Paul Travelers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duguay v. Progressive Corp./St. Paul Travelers, 50 So. 3d 42, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18069, 2010 WL 4722493 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Claimant raises four issues in this workers’ compensation appeal. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the Final Compensation Order in all respects. We reject Claimant’s argument that the Judge of Compensation Claims erred in denying continuing authorization of Dr. Maser. In context, we read the Final Compensation Order as denying continuing authorization of Dr. Maser only for treatment related to the unauthorized surgery.

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, HAWKES and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 So. 3d 42, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18069, 2010 WL 4722493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duguay-v-progressive-corpst-paul-travelers-fladistctapp-2010.