Dugger v. Tayloe
This text of 121 U.S. 286 (Dugger v. Tayloe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
These are writs of error brought for' the review of judgments of the Supreme Court of Alabama. No assignment of errors was returned with the writ in either of the cases, as required by § 997 of the Revised Statutes. No counsel has appeared for the plaintiffs in error, but the cases have both been submitted by the defendants in error on briefs, without any specification of errors by the plaintiffs, as required by Rule 21, § 2, 108 U. S. 585. We, therefore, affirm the judgment in each case, .under § 4 of the same rule, 108 U. S. 585, for want of a due prosecution of the writ of error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 U.S. 286, 7 S. Ct. 895, 30 L. Ed. 946, 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dugger-v-tayloe-scotus-1887.