Dugger v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Florida

Dugger v. Hubbard

610 So. 2d 433, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 749, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2039, 1992 WL 362217

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 10, 1992

DocketNo. 79151

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 610 So. 2d 433 (Dugger v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dugger v. Hubbard, 610 So. 2d 433, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 749, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2039, 1992 WL 362217 (Fla. 1992).

Pincite

Opinions

OVERTON, Justice.

In Hubbard v. Dugger, 590 So.2d 1031, 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the First District Court of Appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance:

MAY THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS RELY ON INFORMATION TAKEN FROM AN ARREST REPORT WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE [PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT] AS THE SOLE BASIS FOR DETERMINING AN INMATE’S ELIGIBILITY FOR PROVISIONAL CREDITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 944.277, FLORIDA STATUTES[?]

Wé have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution.

We answered the identical question in the affirmative in Dugger v. Grant, 610 So.2d 428 (Fla.1992). In accordance with that decision, we quash the decision of the district court in the instant case.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur. KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion, in which BARKETT, C.J., and SHAW, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI