Dugger v. Hubbard
610 So. 2d 433, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 749, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2039, 1992 WL 362217
Opinions
In Hubbard v. Dugger, 590 So.2d 1031, 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the First District Court of Appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance:
MAY THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS RELY ON INFORMATION TAKEN FROM AN ARREST REPORT WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE [PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT] AS THE SOLE BASIS FOR DETERMINING AN INMATE’S ELIGIBILITY FOR PROVISIONAL CREDITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 944.277, FLORIDA STATUTES[?]
Wé have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution.
We answered the identical question in the affirmative in Dugger v. Grant, 610 So.2d 428 (Fla.1992). In accordance with that decision, we quash the decision of the district court in the instant case.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dugger v. Hubbard, 610 So. 2d 433, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 749, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2039, 1992 WL 362217 (Fla. 1992).
610 So. 2d 433 (Dugger v. Hubbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Florida Parole Com'n
625 So. 2d 926 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)