Duggan v. O'Grady

Supreme Court

Duggan v. O'Grady

315 U.S. 799

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJuly 1, 1942

DocketNo. 801

StatusPublished

This text of 315 U.S. 799 (Duggan v. O'Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duggan v. O'Grady, 315 U.S. 799 (1942).

Pincite

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska. [800]*800February 2, 1942. Neil Olson, present Warden of the Nebraska State Penitentiary, substituted as the party respondent in the place and stead of Joseph O’Grady, resigned, on motion of the petitioner. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska. [800]*800February 2, 1942. Neil Olson, present Warden of the Nebraska State Penitentiary, substituted as the party respondent in the place and stead of Joseph O’Grady, resigned, on motion of the petitioner. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

315 U.S. 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duggan-v-ogrady-scotus-1942.