Duggan v. New England Railroad

52 N.E. 519, 172 Mass. 337, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 784
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 6, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 N.E. 519 (Duggan v. New England Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Duggan v. New England Railroad, 52 N.E. 519, 172 Mass. 337, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 784 (Mass. 1899).

Opinion

Barker, J.

The exceptions must be overruled. The portion of the charge excepted to is not open to the construction which the defendant attempts to put upon it, that the jury were told that they might infer from the failure to give the statutory signals alone that that failure contributed to the plaintiff’s injury. The charge was given in view of all the evidence, and was to be acted upon by the jury in dealing with all the evidence. There was evidence tending to show that the plaintiff and his com[340]*340panion stopped near the tracks before entering upon them, and listened to ascertain whether a train, was approaching. It is possible that at that time, if the law had been complied with by the defendant, the whistle would have been blown or the bell rung, and that the signals would have been heard, notwithstanding the fact that similar signals given after the plaintiff and his companion had started to cross the track were not heard.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
62 L.R.A. 751 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 N.E. 519, 172 Mass. 337, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duggan-v-new-england-railroad-mass-1899.