Duggan v. Lubbin

219 A.D. 433, 220 N.Y.S. 684, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10933
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 18, 1927·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The denials are improper in form. (See Kirschbaum v. Eschmann, 205 N. Y. 127.) Denials of any knowledge or [434] information sufficient to form a belief, proper in form, may be interposed, except as to paragraphs 7th, 8th and 9th. The facts set forth in said paragraphs should be within the knowledge of the defendant. If the allegations thereof are true they should be admitted, otherwise direct denials may be interposed.

The affirmative defenses would have been sufficient if they had contained the additional allegations that at the time of the transaction set forth in the complaint the law of Canada was as alleged.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to serve an amended answer within ten days from the date of the service of the order to be entered herein upon payment of said costs and ten dollars costs of motion at Special Term.

Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Proskatjer, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to serve an amended answer within ten days from service of order upon payment of said costs and ten dollars costs of motion at Special Term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duggan v. Lubbin, 219 A.D. 433, 220 N.Y.S. 684, 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

219 A.D. 433 (Duggan v. Lubbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Majerski v. City of New York
2021 NY Slip Op 02147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Fox Film Corp. v. Gross
56 F.2d 457 (W.D. New York, 1932)
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Transmarine Corp.
220 A.D. 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)