Dugan v. Neville

Ohio Supreme Court

Dugan v. Neville

49 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1892·Published

Opinion

This cause was advanced and heard with the preceding one, Mullen v. Peck, and was argued by Gallagher & Woodbridge, for plaintiff in error, and James T. Tollman, for defendant in error.

The questions involved are decided by the first and third paragraphs of the syllabus in the Mullen case, and as they were determined in the court below in accordance with that decision,

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause was advanced and heard with the preceding one, Mullen v. Peck, and was argued by Gallagher & Woodbridge, for plaintiff in error, and James T. Tollman, for defendant in error.

The questions involved are decided by the first and third paragraphs of the syllabus in the Mullen case, and as they were determined in the court below in accordance with that decision,

The judgment is affirmed.

Dugan v. Neville, 49 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462 (Ohio 1892).

Pincite

49 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462 (Dugan v. Neville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.