Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P.

101 A.D.3d 648, 955 N.Y.2d 873

This text of 101 A.D.3d 648 (Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P., 101 A.D.3d 648, 955 N.Y.2d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

[649]*649Supreme Court properly declined to cede primary jurisdiction of these actions to DHCR, since the actions raise legal issues, including class certification and applicable limitations periods, that should be addressed in the first instance by the courts (Gerard v Clermont York Assoc., LLC, 81 AD3d 497 [1st Dept 2011]; see Staatsburg Water Co. v Staatsburg Fire Dist., 72 NY2d 147, 156 [1988]; Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P., 13 NY3d 270, 287 [2009]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.
918 N.E.2d 900 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire District
527 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Gerard v. Clermont York Associates, LLC
81 A.D.3d 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.3d 648, 955 N.Y.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dugan-v-london-terrace-gardens-lp-nyappdiv-2012.