Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P.

101 A.D.3d 648, 955 N.Y.2d 873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2012·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[649]*649Supreme Court properly declined to cede primary jurisdiction of these actions to DHCR, since the actions raise legal issues, including class certification and applicable limitations periods, that should be addressed in the first instance by the courts (Gerard v Clermont York Assoc., LLC, 81 AD3d 497 [1st Dept 2011]; see Staatsburg Water Co. v Staatsburg Fire Dist., 72 NY2d 147, 156 [1988]; Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P., 13 NY3d 270, 287 [2009]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P., 101 A.D.3d 648, 955 N.Y.2d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

101 A.D.3d 648 (Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hess v. EDR Assets LLC
2019 NY Slip Op 2658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Kreisler v. B-U Realty Corp.
2018 NY Slip Op 6054 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P.
45 Misc. 3d 362 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)