Dufur v. Home Investment Co.
This text of 100 N.W. 831 (Dufur v. Home Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order vacating a final judgment. The order was not made during the term at which the judgment was rendered, but at a subsequent term. There was no claim that the judgment was void or was the result of a clerical error, nor was there any proof or claim that it was rendered through mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, so as to come within the provisions of sec. 2832, Stats. 1898. Neither was the motion brought within the provisions of sec. 2879, Stats. 1898. Under these circumstances, the court manifestly erred in vacating the judgment. Whitney v. Karner, 44 Wis. 568; Zinc C. Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 103 Wis. 125, 79 N. W. 229; Bassett v. Bassett, 99 Wis. 344, 74 N. W. 780.
By the Gouri. — Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 N.W. 831, 122 Wis. 470, 1904 Wisc. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dufur-v-home-investment-co-wis-1904.