Dufrene v. Smeaton

80 N.W. 267, 59 Neb. 67, 1899 Neb. LEXIS 317
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 5, 1899
DocketNo. 8,976
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 N.W. 267 (Dufrene v. Smeaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dufrene v. Smeaton, 80 N.W. 267, 59 Neb. 67, 1899 Neb. LEXIS 317 (Neb. 1899).

Opinion

Norval, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from a final order rendered by the court below on June 25,1896. The appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, since no transcript was filed in this court until. December 26, 1896, which was more than six months after the entry of the final order sought to be reviewed. See Verges v. Roush, 1 Nebr., 113; Glore v. Hare, 4 Nebr., 131; Horn v. Miller, 20 Nebr., 98; Chapman v. Allen, 33 Nebr., 129; Withnell v. City of Omaha, 37 Nebr., 621. The filing of a transcript of the judgment or final order in the appellate court within the time prescribed by statute is a jurisdictional matter which can not be waived by the parties.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stout v. Cunningham
162 P. 000 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.W. 267, 59 Neb. 67, 1899 Neb. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dufrene-v-smeaton-neb-1899.